🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming small “playful character”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but very loyal friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have become pawns in a struggle between a defunct facility, local and national governments and welfare campaigners.

But those closest to the whales say the impassioned debate over their fate often ignores the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the Canadian government blocked the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled facility near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to put them down unless the government pays for the cost of their survival. Canada’s marine resources official has refused that request, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious position.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Experts say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and group interactions indicate they are remarkably smart creatures – something Kristy Burgess discovered first-hand.

She spent three years as a whale caretaker, a job that required earning the trust of the aquatic animals.

“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so astounded by the details and unique traits in their characters. She cultivated a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting temperaments.

“Eve selected me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Both transformed the way I understand connection.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s connection with the whales evolved against a background of growing public opposition to their enclosure.

During her time at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In all, 19 belugas have died at the park since recent years, a number which the park attributes to natural mortality, but which activists say indicates the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The park did not admit visitors to the public over the recent season, but the former trainer says she observed directly effects of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the tanks because they’re degrading and not being maintained. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and navigate with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The facility did not respond to a inquiry, but previously claimed: “The whales … get far higher quality veterinary services and around the clock care than any person in the UK, or other places.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in the spring following the demise of Eos, an ailing beluga the caretakers had to humanely kill. She said the park believed information of the death were disclosed to the media and she was fired soon after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and staff members in anguish. She says the park’s threat to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any attempts to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “considerable personnel”, equipment and specialized tools.

“It’s impossible in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess advocates for calls for the whales to be removed right away from the park, with its crumbling tanks and shrinking team.

In recent months, the nation’s government official turned down a proposal to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the request would have meant a continued life in confinement and a return to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As Canadians, we know that marine mammals are meant for the sea, not in pools for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience authorize an relocation that would continue the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But Burgess said the official’s remarks indicate a wider incorrect perception of the circumstances of existence for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The public needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in enclosed habitats and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As authorities attempt to find a answer, suggestions have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A planned refuge in the region of eastern Canada, which now received government approval, has proven highly debated. The planned site, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain hopeful that it could eventually represent a sustainable solution for a number of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “merely an experiment” in the whales’ future.

Others say the possibility of a refuge represents a worldwide trend away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a viable approach in the coming months.

Charles Vinick, director of the sanctuary project, said the site will replicate the mental engagement and diet the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive environment. He said after the well-being of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|